• WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    De-centralization and open source was always the better way. Technology started on this path and the corporate powers have done everything they can to sabotage and destroy open tech.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah, I find it funny that people don’t remember DVD DRM. I guess it wasn’t noticeable to Americans, but you move from Latvia to the UK and suddenly all your movies are duds. You can at least use a VPN today to circumvent this bull shit in many cases, no such luck back then.

        P.S. What was even worse for people living in xUSSR countries is that part of DVDs came from Russia (region 5) and part came from Europe (zone 2, because many xUSSR countries were assigned zone 2). The same was true for DVD players. So it was always a puzzle what to buy. Fuck this shit.

  • alexc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    The problem you are describing is not malware or viruses. They’re just the tools.

    The problem is capitalism, which turns everything free into something on which a profit can be made

  • SteefLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think i read somewhere that the cia said they dont install bugs anymore because now ppl do that themselfs.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s also a lot easier to do it in software, since you don’t need to splice wires and leave physical traces like you would have had to do in the day.

      A well-configured charger or Flash drive can do that job for you, and can spread itself.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, since most modern chargers and cables have internal chips to communicate capabilities with for things like fast-charging. It is not difficult to have the chip identify itself as something else, and execute a payload.

          A common attack method is to have it show up as a keyboard, and execute a series of key-sequences when connected to a computer (like opening and executing things through a command prompt).

          It is also why you should try and avoid plugging random USB cables/chargers into your phone/computer when out and about, since you don’t exactly know if the other end is what it appears to be.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    shit like this is why im going to eventually create my own little internet island.

    Dw, i’m going to rule over it like a dictator, no democracy here :)

      • sgt_hulka@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have a theory that this is the next iteration of Internet. A private internet linked by vpn over the public Internet. Probably already exists in some form over Tor or in dusty Pirate communities. All we need is a no-commercial-entities clause and a Yahoo clone and we could rock like it’s 1994!

  • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s why Foss will always be better, and we need to support these developers. They also need to protect their software better from capitalist ghouls that will profit from it for free

    • Programmer Belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Protecting FOSS is impossible, there will always be a company that uses your codebase, credits you and includes advertisements to your program.

      We need to make using FOSS projects the default and using the corporate options as the backup option.

      • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        What I mean is better licenses that make sure you get paid if companies profit from it, and harsher penalties for those that get caught infringing the license

  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It was considered best practice to never install anything

    In what universe? You might as well never turn on your computer.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If there’s anyone here that cares about their privacy and doesn’t know this already:

    If you have a choice between accessing the website through a browser and installing an app, use the browser. Browsers (typically) at least try to protect the types of information that gets sent, whereas there are much fewer restrictions (again, typically) for apps.

    Everyone wants you to install apps because apps (typically) get access to much more data.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The worst is many of these apps are just websites repackaged as apps. They just want the elevated access being an app gives them.

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yeah, when I was setting up my first smartphone there was a very weird moment where I had to go against a lifetime of training on laptops and desktop PCs and just immediately invite every single app to fuck me up the arse if I wanted it to function as anything more than an expensive telephone with a fancy screen. But invite them up my arse I did.