Sorry but those looks like Midland radios (:
Sorry but those looks like Midland radios (:
Please remember that Webkit is based on KHTML, the browsing engine that Konqueror, the webbrowser in the KDE suite, used.
So Apple forked KHTML, made WebKit, Safari, Chrome and loads of other browsers used it and improved it, then Google forked WebKit, and made Blink, their current browsing engine
You know what?
I completely misread the title, I read it as what action did you agree the most with.
And since that was the one big thing that came to mind, that is what I wrote, I am sorry for the confusion
Yes, it would be better, but unless I saw the code, understood it and verified that it is the code running I would not trust it as much as I would need to trust a system like Jarvis
So what you are saying is that you should make a script that slowly changes random articles on a wiki on fandom, so that over time the information will be gone and any backups fandom may have taken are outdated or bad as well.
EDIT: this reminds me of a virus I heard about, it would infect your excel files, and slowly introduce rounding errors in them.
This checks out.
The Scientology fight
Damn, I completely misread the question, sorry about that.
Wasn’t a similar pitch pushed for CCTV?
Most bikes are not bassy it’s mostly thumpers and harleys that are bassy.
Fair critisism.
Just wait until you get passed by a bunch of squids on sport bikes with parallel twins and I4s, those are much higher
I know, they attract idiots who refuse to keep the playtime to the track, and endanger everyone else.
an additional sensory input for the fuckhead texting on the freeway is not a bad thing.
The depends on the stimuli, a sudden loud noise as a bike zooms past a distracted driver is a TERRIBLE “sensory input” as you say, it could easily cause the driver to swerve causing a big accident which would not happen if not for the noise triggering it.
You could, and should argue that the distracted driver should not have been driving distractedly, I would however add that the biker should not have driven past at so high speed that they other drivers only notice them once they have passed.
Yep, but you can’t get all DLC any more, its absolutely worth it, still, but I just wanted to let people know
Forza Horizon 4 is my favourite, 5 is mostly meh.
Then we have Beamng, that is increadible
This is the classic argument for loud bikes, and it shows a lack of understanding physics and human nature.
Physics, the sound is generated by the exhaust pointing backwards, this means that the sound doesn’t propagate well ahead of the bike, but way better behind the bike.
Human nature, human nature when hearing a loud sound is to find the source, however, by the time a driver has heard the sound the source have often passed, causing a needless distraction. Also, bikes tend to make a very basy sound, this is terrible for humans to hear the direction of.
Finally, if bikers are so concerned about being noticed by other drivers, why don’t they wear high visibility vests and trousers?
You know what is faster than a motor bike?
Radiowaves.
The police patrol knows the direction that the biker is going, call a patrol there.
Light is also faster than a motor bike, get a recording of the license plate and use that to find it.
Or if the church/neighbours simply start logging the guy’s schedule, give it to the police and have them wait for him.
You obviously need to bring evidence to back up your claims, that is not in dispute here, the issue I have is that for some reason the normal evidence isn’t good enough, evidence that in any other point would be fine, but just in the arbitrary case it is deemed not enough.
Any evidence that prooves an extraordinary claim will by definition be extraordinary.
So as long as you submit the normal kind of evidence needed to describe how to reproduce the claim, and others can verify your claim, the evidence is fine.
No, the scale of the evidence does not need to scale with the claim, if you have evidence for a claim, and it can be verified, then you don’t need more.
I can accept that, more is a quantative meassure, extraordinady is a subjective meassure
IT guy here, I want to be as far away from any user logs as possible that are not directly related to solving a work issue.
I don’t want to know anything about your browsing history, your email, your chats or your documents. I want to install computers, configure systems, plan deployments, fix odd issues, write scripts, make reports, and while doing that listen/watch youtube videos about a guy setting up obsolete systems like Sun thin clients, installing BeOS, Apple Rhapsody, installing Windows 3.11 on a mobile phone, stuff like that.
I hate that quote.
It is idiotic, it mixes objectivity with subjectivity.
“Claims require evidence” is the proper way, you make an exraordinary claim, you simply need to provide evidence for it.
I will never forget when I had to help a coworker with her laptop, she had long nails that had worn grooves in her keyboard keys.
She typed on her nails, the sound it made was terrible.
At this point I am afraid to give him ideas…