• RandomStickman@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Broke: Italy is the successor to the Roman Empire
    Woke: Hong Kong is the successor to the Roman Empire Bespoke: We are ALL the successor to the Roman Empire on this blessed day.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      They ready to twerk

      “You may look perhaps for a troop of Spanish maidens to win applause by immodest dance and song, sinking down with quivering thighs to the floor…”

      Juvenal’s 11th Satire, 1st century AD

  • Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hashkully, the Byzantine Empire never existed. It was always the Eastern Roman Empire.

    It was recoined as the Byzantine Empire after the fall of Constantinople from the Ottoman Empire in the 1400s by Renaissance scholars a few hundred years later.

    They changed the history books when they wanted to make a distinction from the ancient Roman Empire from the very different but still same Roman Empire that fell not long before them, because the western Romans were considered pagans, and the East were Christians.

    It was called the Byzantine Empire because the city that existed before Constantinople, was called Byzantium. Which was the new Roman capital when Emperor Constantine seized power, who was the first Christian Roman Emperor.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Hmm, arguably there should be a more direct path to the Papal States. The church had land throughout the migration period, although I don’t know enough to say if there was a period where none of it was sovereign.

    Anyway, it’s clearly East Timor. Or maybe Nero is still alive in Antarctica. /s