Summary

The fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson has drawn attention due to the phrase “deny, defend, depose” reportedly written on the shooter’s ammunition, echoing criticism of insurer practices like “delay, deny, defend.”

UnitedHealthcare, one of the largest U.S. health insurers, has faced scrutiny over claim denials and delays, including a Senate report highlighting issues with Medicare Advantage prior authorizations.

The killing has sparked public outrage and dark humor on social media, reflecting widespread frustration with health insurers, which many blame for rising healthcare costs and access barriers.

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Sparked public outrage” Where? The CEO’s of America headquarters? I’ve literally only seen elation & humorous remarks.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    6 days ago

    Somebody lost someone and they correctly identified the person most guilty. That is what these people and their undeserved money fear. They fear when the riots start the people don’t trash their neighborhood for once but seek out those to blame and trash them. That is when you will see gun control become a priority.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sounds like a really roundabout way to get gun control but sure I’ll take it.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Maybe you should re evaluate that. Like in ‘are we the baddies?’ style.

        //Edit-
        I am certainly not saying the CEO was anything other than a bad guy. I’m talking about being anti-gun.

        IE, 'if when a guy with a gun kills someone we all agree is bad, and your takeaway from that is ‘yay now we can can the gun’, maybe you aren’t the anti-violence person you like to think you are.

          • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Not even slightly okay. I am shedding no tears for this asshole. My comment was directed at the user who is happy that this might lead to more gun control.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Yeah no. Gun ownership in the USA is fucking crazy. How the fuck can a country have regular school shootings and not ban guns or at least regulate them slightly.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              And the fact that people seem to think that they absolutely need to own deadly weapons .

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                without receipts or red tape. Most countries have a licensing program for firearms.

                It would be trivial to mandate each state license gun owners in order to purchase firearms but we don’t even do that.

          • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            regulate them slightly

            I would encourage you to educate yourself. If you honestly think there is not even slight regulation of gun ownership, then you are not informed on this issue.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              I obviously exaggerated.

              But compared to civilized nations it’s not too far off.

          • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Not saying otherwise. I’m saying if your takeaway is that it’s good to put more gun control, maybe you should reevaluate your position on gun control.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              People arguing for gun control don’t deny the usefulness of guns. Cars are useful too, it’s a lot harder to get a car than a gun.

  • Josey_Wales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Sparked public outrage”

    Only reference in article is a link to another story discussing outrage on social media in general. AP is pushing a capitalist agenda.

    I personally haven’t seen any outrage. Just that dark humor.

    • dvlsg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve seen plenty of outrage.

      It’s just all targeted at the insurance companies.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think you’re misreading this sentence: I think it’s clearly implying public outrage surrounding US health insurance, not about the killing itself. “The killing has sparked public outrage and dark humor on social media” pretty clearly implies to me that they mean the public outrage associated with the dark humor.

    • b34k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      The only outrage I’ve seen is directed towards mods on various platforms for locking community discussion about this incident.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        My dad got fucked around by insurance until he spent the rest of his (probably shortened) life in a wheelchair. For profit insurance should be a crime, they’re all ghouls, fuck em all.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The killing has sparked public outrage

    I legitimately haven’t seen a single person upset other than someone posting a screenshot of Tim Walz doing the typical tweet of condolences

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m outraged… The way that healthcare companies decide who gets to live and who needs to die for profit.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Weirdly, I’ve seen a few .ml usernames complaining about how killing people is always evil, and that we’re evil for glorifying it

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        I assume those people are trolls of the contrarian category.

        People are too thrilled to be upset by trolling attempts about the topic. That’s actually impressive.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      You got to read more of the sentence:

      The killing has sparked public outrage and dark humor on social media, reflecting widespread frustration with health insurers

      The outrage isn’t about the killing. The outrage is about the health insurers. The killing is just the spark that got us all to talk about it.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    the phrase “deny, defend, depose” reportedly written on the shooter’s ammunition

    This is likely in reference to a book that is highly critical of the medical insurance field called “Delay, Deny Defend”. Except here, the shooter actually did depose the CEO for his company’s actions.

    • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Reading the article, it’s either a poor choice of words on the part of the AP journalist, or a deliberate choice of words to muddy the situation when this inevitably gets compressed into a short reference memory as the news cycle moves on.

      What’s described is very much the outrage expressed against insurance practices re: medical care, part of the celebration of this guy’s death.

  • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    6 days ago

    If they catch this guy he will never see trial. No way they’d risk him getting up on the stand, and even less likely they’d want to try their luck getting twelve people to convict. He’ll go down in a hail of gunfire or get Epstein’d

    • kuato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 days ago

      No way they’d risk him getting up on the stand

      Defendants don’t get up on the stand if they want any chance of a not guilt verdict.

      and even less likely they’d want to try their luck getting twelve people to convict.

      It’s not so unlikely. It ought to be, but it isn’t.

      • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        You think they’re willing to take the chance that the guy who assassinated a CEO with bullets with messages on them wouldn’t take the stand to deliver a monologue?

        • kuato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Yes. I think your perspective is through Hollywood-tinted glasses. When was the last time something like that happened in real life and actually had devastating effects on the ruling class?

      • Manalith@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        Chances are they find someone they can pass off as him and then take him out publicly enough that everyone just accepts that it must’ve been the guy.

        Probably not the right call if this guy was planning to go vigilante and wasn’t just upset at a loss he had to endure specifically because of united.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 days ago

    All I’ve seen is celebration and laughter.

    There’s been no outrage. Maybe from a few bootlickers. But nobody who’s opinion you should respect.

    • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hey, I’m outraged!

      Outraged at the fact that the system is so fucking shitty someone felt the need to do this in retaliation.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    The pigs hunting this soldier need to take note. There’s a lot of angry, sick, and wronged people in the world, that these rich fucks are doing the evils to. We execute a CEO in broad daylight and within days another insurer planned to limit anesthesia. The board of directors will be getting executed next, the pigs need to get their heads out of their asses and realize who’s side their on. They are currently standing where the enemy of the people stands. It’s a dangerous place, and we are hungry.

        • kipo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          They absolutely will, as soon as the media spotlight is off them. Or, they’ll come up with an alternative cut to the health plans that’s even more cruel and profitable. It is what the system demands.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Which is where 99% of their membership seeks care, and now will not have this issue.

          But yeah this sucks for the anesthesiologists at say, Mass General when someone from CT comes up to Boston for something complicated.

          This is what is happening now that they can no longer squeeze groups or individuals for more cost share, for more premiums. No one can afford it. Then they try to get creative cutting services.

    • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Unless you’re the guy who pulled the trigger or helped him in some way, stop saying “we” while sitting safely behind your keyboard

  • modus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    Interestingly, NYT doesn’t mention the word “depose” in any of their articles on the matter.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I thought you had to be wrong but I just checked and you’re right. They all mention “‘delay’, ‘deny’, and other words”. The only article published by The NY Times that included “depose” on the casings was in an opinion piece by Zaynep Tufekci published today that referenced the AP News articles.

      Then came the reports that bullet casings bearing the words “delay,” “deny” and “depose were found at the scene. “Delay” and “deny” clearly echo tactics insurers use to avoid paying claims. “Depose”? Well, that’s the sudden, forceful removal from a high position. Ah.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    The fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson has drawn attention due to the phrase “deny, defend, depose” reportedly written on the shooter’s ammunition, echoing criticism of insurer practices like “delay, deny, defend.”

    I’m guessing he didn’t consider the LIFO nature of a clip when loading, and “depose” is his answer to “delay, deny, defend”. So he put depose, defend, and deny into the CEO in that order