• flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    One thing these kinds of articles that are designed to stoke generational conflicts never mention is that rich people live longer. Like, obviously older people would be proportionally richer, the poorer people from that generation are dead. Also, friendly reminder, all this stoking of generational conflicts does is distract us from the real divide in society.

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    You could start taxing them. Especially the rich ones.

    You know that’s an option, right?

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Rich vs working class, not boomers vs millennials or whatever garbage you’re trying to push.

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Boomers are the rich, that’s the whole point.

      They lived through the largest economic boon in history and kept it all for themselves.

      Yeah fuck their kids too but let’s not forget who is perpetuating this system and it ain’t young people.

      Hell the “young” candidate this election is 60!!!

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Actually there is some truth to this SPECIFICALLY with Boomers. After the War, Western countries rebuilt economic powerhouses up to a certain point, after which the ladder was pulled up. Boomers had more opportunities than any generation before or after them.